In explaining my own
framework for analyzing traditional masculinity last week, I forgot a very
important element of the “constant” section. Men have to be true to their
heaven-given nature, and they have to respect the heaven-given nature of
others. This means that Song Jiang in Outlaws
of the Marsh (水滸傳) has to accept
and deal with the ferocious berserker Li Kui because Li is one of his sworn
brothers. Li does his best to learn self-control, but due to his heaven-given
nature, he is not terribly successful. Jia Baoyu in The Story of the Stone is an immortal stone in love with a flower
fairy. He has been sent to the human realm to learn a lesson, and he must attain
balance and self-control by eventually studying and passing the imperial
service exams as an exercise in filial piety to his family. He is, however,
mainly controlled by his true nature and returns to the immortal realms after successfully
passing the exams. In the real Liu family, Pa is very in touch with his own
nature, and he takes great pride in knowing the natures of each of his seven
children. He deals with each child in a particular way based on his perception
of that child’s true nature. Perhaps this deep sense of a fated or heaven-given
identity is what enables Pa to feel secure in the face of Western masculinity.
Although Pa is not
worried about comparing himself to men of the West, most scholars tend to agree
that Chinese men have been in a crisis of masculinity since China’s defeat in
the Opium Wars in the middle of the 19th century. Since that time,
more and more Chinese men have felt that they come up short in comparison to
Westerners, and they keep trying to improve themselves to restore their
traditional sense of confidence vis-à-vis the “over-sexed hairy barbarians” or
“Western devils.”
The May Fourth
movement was one way in which Chinese men of the early 20th century
attempted to redefine themselves. They looked to Meiji Japan and saw that its
rapid Europeanization enabled it to become an imperial power in Asia; hence,
the men of the May Fourth movement attempted to emulate the Japanese in westernizing
themselves. In general, the May Fourth men tended to be warriors with the pen. In
The Romantic Generation of Modern Chinese
Writers, Leo Ou-Fan Lee describes a book of satire from the 1920s that
describes these men. “Such a man is able to read and to write and is somewhat
familiar with traditional Chinese literature as well as Western authors. He is
bohemian and amorous, emotional rather than rational. He is up-to-date on the
literary scene. He has modern, fashionable clothes; drinks and smokes;
patronizes brothels; and has debts and an illness (preferably tuberculosis or
syphilis). He writes his own original fiction or translates literature on
fashionable topics into Chinese. He regularly contributes articles to journals
and magazines. He attends meetings and gives
long speeches. He sponsors new writers, and he is ready for change (39-40)”
(Summary from my MA thesis). I think the bite of the preceding satire shows
that men of that era were not entirely satisfied with the May Fourth model.
During the Maoist
era, ideal masculinity was redefined as the rugged, stolid peasant fighters of
the People’s Liberation Army. These men populate the pages of the short stories
by Ru Zhi-juan and the novels Tracks in
the Snowy Forest and Red Crag. They
are also seen in the genre of films known as “Red Classics.” Xueping Zhong has
written a book called Masculinity
Besieged about Chinese films and literature of the post-Mao era and how
they continue to seek a satisfactory ideal for Chinese masculinity in
comparison with Western men.
My perception of
the preceding styles of masculinity is that they are not balanced. The May
Fourth version seems to have swung to the wen
and yin extremes. Confucianism was
considered to be rigid, out-dated, and an impediment to progress, while
Buddhism and Taoism were seen as ignorant superstitions that are incompatible
with modern science; hence, the Confucian-Buddhist/Taoist binary was discarded
among the May Fourth intellectual elite. The Maoist view of masculinity seems
to be a pendulum swing to the wu and yang poles. Confucianism, Buddhism, and
Taoism were also eschewed as superstitious, feudalistic thought during the
Maoist era.
With the
repudiation of China’s three religious/philosophical traditions, modern men may
lack a nuanced compass for their constancy. Filial piety still resonates
strongly, but it is increasingly reduced to earning lots and lots of money with
which to support elderly parents and to give them elaborate funerals. Honoring
one’s ancestors mainly means that a man must be a resounding business success
in quantifiable, monetary terms. These views differ from what I have noticed in
Pa’s practice of filial piety. His idea of filial piety includes caring for the
feelings of the elderly. This is why he took pains to ensure that Ma could
spend time with Grandma Chu. Pa strove for success in business, but to me, it
seems that a large part of what he considers a life well lived lies in the
facts that he did not sell off any of his daughters, even when the family was
poor, and that he successfully raised his children to be upright, contributing
members of society. He is quite proud that all of his grandchildren are
becoming successful adults in a moral sense, instead of a merely in a monetary
sense. Yuni and many of his younger Maternal Uncles do not share Pa’s emphasis
on feelings and upright living. They focus mainly on money and business success
as the measure of their masculinity and the proof of their filial piety.
This shift in
emphasis on the meaning of “filial piety” might confirm Kam Louie’s argument
that contemporary, transnational businessmen have replaced the Confucian literati scholars as ideal men in China…
Last summer, when
I was in Shanghai, I read a newspaper article about an elite school in Beijing
that trains beautiful women how to be wives of China’s new elite class of billionaires.
Only beautiful women with exquisite skin and figures are accepted. They learn
how to manage luxurious households, how to deal with mistresses, how to order
at the finest restaurants, how to listen sympathetically to their men, etc.
etc. When they are ready to graduate, the school also provides discreet
matchmaking services at the expense of the billionaires who want elegant,
well-trained, docile wives.
The effect of what
women want in men is probably important to the construction of contemporary
masculine identities. Fall semester of 2010, our Asian Studies graduate seminar
did a sociological study of 40 consumers of Korean popular culture among the
residents of southern California. One of the surprising results was that most
of them liked the K-pop stars and Korean TV dramas because they wanted to watch
the beautiful male stars. Many of these consumers, the majority of whom were Asian-American
females, espoused standards of male beauty similar to those enumerated in Song
Geng’s The Fragile Scholar and other
scholarly works about traditional Chinese masculinity among Confucian literati officials of the imperial era.
In addition to the almost effeminate beauty of the male stars, the women were
attracted to their designer clothes and affluent life-styles. Looking back on my
arguments with female friends in Taiwan when I was preparing to marry Yuni, I
realize that most of my friends objected to the fact that he was too brawny,
too dark, too unrefined, and too poor. They, too, were looking for successful
businessmen in the fragile scholar style as their ideal men. So modern women,
perhaps, are not as worried about comparing Chinese/Asian men to Westerners,
creating a quandary for the men… do they try to show up the brawny Western
devils or land a nice Chinese wife with their lily-white skin, ruby lips,
slender hips, and bulging wallets?
In conclusion, I
think that contemporary Chinese masculinity is a work in progress. Men of
different regions, different generations, and different social classes all seem
to have different ideas of what it means to be a proper man. Yet, the Confucian
ideals of filial piety and honoring one’s ancestors, at the very least through
lucrative professional accomplishments, seem to resonate among Chinese men of
all ages and social classes around the world. The Taoist and
Buddhist ideals in my father-in-law’s version of masculinity do not seem as
prevalent among younger men, urban men, and men of my acquaintance from
mainland China. I expect this lack of mitigating factors gives modern men more
stress and more feelings of inadequacy, especially since guilt-tripping men
about their lack of filial piety and career success is a woman’s best weapon in
the modern Chinese battle of the sexes.
No comments:
Post a Comment